Why Not Kill Her A Juror Perspective The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition) Paul Sanders Kelly Rhodes Jr Paul A Sanders Books
Download As PDF : Why Not Kill Her A Juror Perspective The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition) Paul Sanders Kelly Rhodes Jr Paul A Sanders Books
On June 4, 2008, at approximately 530 p.m. in a quiet suburb of Phoenix, Arizona, Jodi Arias stabbed Travis Alexander 29 times, cut his throat, and then shot him in the head. The killer then went to great lengths to cover up the crime, including sending his grandmother flowers, going to the memorial service, driving by the victim's house, and calling the lead investigator, Detective Esteban Flores.
It would take five years before the case would be put in front of a second jury and leave them to decide whether Arias was a cold, calculating killer or the victim of extreme domestic violence at the hands of an abusive boyfriend.
Paul Sanders sat in the public gallery for each and every one of the 47 days of the trial, and took extensive notes, transposing every twist and turn of it to social media every night. With allegations of pornography, racial slurs, and a search for the answer to the question of domestic violence and alleged child abuse, the journey is both painful and meticulous.
Humbling, intimidating, and powerful at the same time, this trial would test the jurors in ways they could never have foreseen, in their ultimate search for truth and justice.
Why Not Kill Her A Juror Perspective The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition) Paul Sanders Kelly Rhodes Jr Paul A Sanders Books
The story line was good since I did not really know about the Arias trial. But his constant reference to the DeVault trial that he was a jury on kind of ruined or at least dampened my liking of this book. If I wanted to read about the DeVault trial, I would of bought his first book Brain Damage. When this jury went into their deliberation, I had to skip over several pages because he made me feel like I was reading the book about the DeVault trial. I felt that way because his telling us readers what was being said and the things being done in the DeVault jury deliberation. I also his constant use of the word One such in One should not, or One should... He could use the word you or people instead of his over use of the word One. As for his letter to Travis Alexander at the end was very weird and confusing for me. The book could of done without that letter. Overall this author can become a very good writer in time if he just stick to the trial he is writing about and not about the one he served on. Hopefully his 4th book will be better book to read. And I will buy it and read it.Product details
|
Tags : Amazon.com: Why Not Kill Her: A Juror's Perspective: The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition): Paul Sanders, Kelly Rhodes, Jr. Paul A. Sanders: Books, ,Paul Sanders, Kelly Rhodes, Jr. Paul A. Sanders,Why Not Kill Her: A Juror's Perspective: The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial,Paul A. Sanders, Jr.,B06XC42YVR
People also read other books :
- The Quadity Jacob I Pfeiffer 9780692818305 Books
- The Quadity Jacob I Pfeiffer 9780692818305 Books
- Perfectly Incorrect Why The Common Core Is Psychologically And Cognitively Unsound eBook Terry Marselle
- The Search For My Inner "I" Joseph W Macy 9781483679297 Books
- Perfectly Incorrect Why The Common Core Is Psychologically And Cognitively Unsound eBook Terry Marselle
Why Not Kill Her A Juror Perspective The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition) Paul Sanders Kelly Rhodes Jr Paul A Sanders Books Reviews
I really enjoyed reading this book. A former juror recaps the sentencing portion of Jodi Arias' trial from his perspective as a trial watcher. My personal opinion is that the book would've been much better had the author refrained from making so many references to his experience as a juror on a different trial. It took away from the overall story, and I ended up skipping over those pages. If not for that, I would've definitely given 5 stars.
This is a hefty book. A day-to-day chronicle of the death penalty re-trial of Arias. I had thought that the author was a juror for this trial, but found that he was a juror for a completely different case, and in this instance, he was a court observer. Slightly misleading. The effort is earnest, though there is much repetition and several typos. This book takes you into the courtroom. The psychological testimony regarding Borderline Personality Disorder was interesting, though disturbing. This was tragic murder, and a cautionary tale about who we allow into our lives.
Dear Paul Sanders
We have spoken via Twitter, in the past, back when this case was going on, and I am amazingly pleased with your work.
I found it quite insightful, and this book was a wonderful companion to me during heavy traffic days, when the audiobook seriously saved me from my own road rage. I loved the way that you compared your experiences at the MDV trial, and applied those views to the trial of this other monster. Coincidentally, I became a juror myself in a pretty ugly case prior to purchasing your book and, as a result, became enthralled reading about your opinion of how the system works. It is true that those of us who believe in the system, and want justice served, find ourselves -like you say- in awe of the "enormity of the position that we are put in." Thanks for showing your passion and thank the higher power that you lived a life that allowed you to express yourself, say your peace, and call out what you believe in. Few people have ever been gifted with such a wonderful opportunity. Good luck on your next endeavors!- Michelle
I want to preface this review by stating I watch every minute of both Jodi Arias trials. That might be why I found this book drawn out, repetitive and tedious at times.
I understand it's suppose to be written from a juror's point of view. For me there was too much repetitive information about jurors general basic thoughts.
The author did capture the personalities and mannerisms of the attorneys to a T. The same is true of the evil waste of space on trial.
The parts of the book that described the actual court proceedures and testimony I found very accurate and compelling. The "hired guns" the defense brought in were as ineffective and down right stupid as described. Dr. DeMarte was as intelligent, professional and knowledgable as described.
The defense attorneys were such slimeballs there is no way to describe them accurately. They had to be seen to be believed. The defense table was occupied by demons.
I admit I fell a little bit in love with Jaun Martinez while watching his mastery of the court room. This book reminded me why. He has a gift and passion for what he does. The reader gets a good picture of someone who is a crusader for victims and their families. His brilliance comes through in the writers descriptions.
I don't think the book yet answers "why not kill her." I would have liked to know more of the ARIAS jury's thoughts and comments. I've understood since the end of the trial it was one juror who refused to vote for death. But why? That question still needs to be answered.
I was against the death penalty for a long time. THIS CASE and the Chesire, Connecticut home invasion case convinced me that some people are pure evil and it's warranted. This book backs that opinion up.
The thing this author did best was humanize the victim. He portrayed Travis Alexander as the successful, warm, kind, loving and giving human being he was. He layed the lies and character assination at the feet of the defense and their client who is one of the most evil human beings I've ever seen.
I would recommend this book to anyone who followed this trial.
The story line was good since I did not really know about the Arias trial. But his constant reference to the DeVault trial that he was a jury on kind of ruined or at least dampened my liking of this book. If I wanted to read about the DeVault trial, I would of bought his first book Brain Damage. When this jury went into their deliberation, I had to skip over several pages because he made me feel like I was reading the book about the DeVault trial. I felt that way because his telling us readers what was being said and the things being done in the DeVault jury deliberation. I also his constant use of the word One such in One should not, or One should... He could use the word you or people instead of his over use of the word One. As for his letter to Travis Alexander at the end was very weird and confusing for me. The book could of done without that letter. Overall this author can become a very good writer in time if he just stick to the trial he is writing about and not about the one he served on. Hopefully his 4th book will be better book to read. And I will buy it and read it.
0 Response to "[J2U]∎ PDF Why Not Kill Her A Juror Perspective The Jodi Arias Death Penalty Retrial (Audible Audio Edition) Paul Sanders Kelly Rhodes Jr Paul A Sanders Books"
Post a Comment